Proppant sand coating for dust reduction

ABSTRACT

The present invention provides for coating proppants, such as sand, with a resin-containing dispersion which dramatically reduces the dust generated during handling, for example in hydraulic fracturing, by protecting the surface of the particle from abrasion and degradation. Such resin-containing dispersion coated-sand may also reduce the wear on metal parts used in transporting such proppants.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit, under 35 USC § 119(e), of U.S.provisional patent application No. 62/128,085, filed Mar. 4, 2015,entitled “PROPPANT SAND COATING FOR DUST REDUCTION” the entiredisclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates, in general, to oil and gas drilling and,more specifically, to proppant sand coatings with resin-containingdispersions to reduce dust.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Coating of hydraulic fracturing (or fracking) sand is not new. Millionsof tons of sand or proppant are used in the oil and gas industry everyyear to stimulate wells and thereby improve productivity. Such sand maybe coated to impart specialized functionality when in use in thedown-hole environment. The sand “props open” the fractures in the wellso that fluids and gas can escape more efficiently. The typical sandcoating is either heat or chemically activated so that the sand will“stick” to itself forming a discrete “pack” or sponge like formationwith open pathways for the fluid and gas to escape. Once the well isdepleted, the sand pack can be “broken” or dissolved so the sand canflow back out of the well and be recovered. Uncoated sand is however,the largest percentage of fracking sand used in the industry.

Uncoated sand can fracture during handling operations creating very fineparticles or dust. This dust is primarily composed of crystalline silicawhich is a known carcinogen. The handling of sand from mining, transportand handling can create large amounts of dust containing crystallinesilica, which can be toxic at low inhalation levels. Reducing the riskto persons involved in handling hydraulic fracturing sand is aresponsible and sustainable goal.

A number of references in the art are directed to coating hydraulicfracturing sand with a variety of materials, such as the use ofthermoplastic coatings.

U.S. Pat. No. 6,582,819, issued to McDaniel et al., provides low densitycomposite particles made of a binder and filler material for use insubterranean formations. The filler includes low density filler andoptionally other filler. The binder includes a polymer and optionallycement. The binder is said to be at least one member of the groupconsisting of epoxy resin, polyurethane resin, alkaline modifiedphenolic resole curable with ester, melamine resin, urea-aldehyde resin,urea-phenol-aldehyde resin, furans, synthetic rubber, polyester resin,and further comprises cross-linking agents and conventional additives.The particles are said to be useful as proppants to prop opensubterranean formation fractures. The particles are also said to beuseful for gravel packing in subterranean formations, water filtrationand artificial turf for sports fields. Methods of making the compositeparticles are also disclosed.

McDaniel et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,527, disclose compositeparticles made of a binder and filler material for use in subterraneanformations. The filler is finely divided mineral and optional fiber. Thebinder is said to be at least one member of the group consisting ofinorganic binder, epoxy resin, novolak resin, resole resin, polyurethaneresin, alkaline phenolic resole curable with ester, melamine resin,urea-aldehyde resin, urea-phenol-aldehyde resin, furans, syntheticrubber, polyester resin, and further comprises cross-linking agents andconventional additives. The particles are proppants said to be useful toprop open subterranean formation fractures. The particles are alsouseful for water filtration and artificial turf for sports fields.Methods of making the composite particles are also disclosed.

U.S. Pat. No. 7,153,575, issued to Anderson et al., teaches coatedparticulate matter wherein the particles are individually coated with afirst set of one or more layers of a curable resin, for example, acombination of phenolic/furan resin or furan resin orphenolic-furan-formaldehyde terpolymer, on a proppant such as sand, andthe first set of layers is coated with a second set of one or morelayers of a curable resin, for example, a novolak resin with curative.Methods for making and using this coated product as a proppant, gravelpack and for sand control are also disclosed.

McCrary et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 7,624,802, teach free flowing coatedparticles and low temperature methods of making the same. Each particlehas a curable coating disposed upon a substrate. The substrate is aparticulate substrate including an inorganic material, a particulatesubstrate including an organic material, a composite substantiallyhomogeneous formed particle including a first portion of an at leastpartly cured binder and filler particles, or a hybrid particle having aninorganic particle as a core and a composite coating including at leastpartially cured resin and filler. The curable coating includes acontinuous phase including resole resin and reactive powder particlesembedded or adhered to the continuous phase. The reactive powderparticles typically include resole resin, novolak resin, polyester,acrylic and/or urethane. A method including applying a coating includingthe continuous phase including resole resin and reactive or non-reactivepowder particles embedded or adhered to the continuous phase.

U.S. Pat. No. 8,133,587, issued to Rediger et al., disclosesthermoplastic coated proppants and methods for preparing thethermoplastic coated proppants. Methods for using these proppants insubterranean well formations and hydraulic fracturing operations, forexample, are also disclosed. The thermoplastics are selected from apolyethylene, a polypropylene, an ethylene vinyl acetate, an ethyleneethyl acrylate, a styrene-isoprene-styrene, anacrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, a styrene-butadiene-styrene, apolystyrene, a polyurethane, an acrylic polymer, a polyvinyl chloride, afluoroplastic, a pine rosin (e.g., tall oil rosin, wood rosin, and gumrosin), a modified rosin (e.g., disproportionated rosins, hydrogenatedrosins, polymerized or oligomerized rosins, Diels-Alder rosin adducts),a rosin ester (e.g., hydrogenated rosin esters, polymerized rosinesters, phenolic-modified rosin esters, dibasic acid-modified rosinesters; the rosin esters can be derived from tall oil rosin, wood rosin,and/or gum rosin), a polysulfide, a styrene-acrylonitrile, a nylon, aphenol-formaldehyde novolak resin, or a combination thereof.

U.S. Pat. No. 8,763,700, issued to McDaniel et al., discloses proppantsfor use in fractured or gravel packed/frac packed oil and gas wells witha contaminant removal component to remove one or more of thecontaminants found in subterranean water/hydrocarbon from a productionwell. The water/hydrocarbon cleaning proppant solids may be used asdiscrete particles in a proppant formulation, as a coating on proppantsolids in pores of a porous proppant solid or as part of the proppant'sinternal structure. The contaminant removal component removescontaminants, especially dissolved contaminants, in the subterraneanwater or hydrocarbon before the water/hydrocarbon leaves the well. Forthose contaminant removal components that can be regenerated, such asion exchange resins, a measured quantity of an acidic regenerationsolution can be injected into the fractured stratum for regeneration andrecovered when the well resumes production.

U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2013/0065800, in the of McDanielet al., discloses solid proppants coated with a coating that exhibitsthe handling characteristics of a pre-cured coating while alsoexhibiting the ability to form particle-to-particle bonds at theelevated temperatures and pressures within a wellbore. The coatingincludes a substantially homogeneous mixture of (i) at least oneisocyanate component having at least 2 isocyanate groups, and (ii) acuring agent comprising a monofunctional alcohol, amine or amide. Thecoating process can be performed with short cycle times, e.g., less thanabout 4 min., and still produce a dry, free-flowing, coated proppantthat exhibits low dust characteristics during pneumatic handling butalso proppant consolidation down-hole for reduced washout and goodconductivity. Such proppants are said to form good unconfinedcompressive strength without use of an bond activator, are substantiallyunaffected in bond formation characteristics under down-hole conditionsdespite prior heat exposure, and are said to be resistant to leachingwith hot water.

McCrary et al., in U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2013/0186624,discuss solid proppants coated in a process that includes the steps of:(a) coating free-flowing proppant solids with a first component ofeither a polyol or an isocyanate in mixer; (b) adding a second componentof either an isocyanate or a polyol that is different from the firstcomponent at a controlled rate or volume sufficient to form apolyurethane coating on the proppant solids; and (c) adding water at arate and volume sufficient to retain the free-flowing characteristics ofthe proppant solids.

U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2014/0274819, in the name ofMcCrary et al., discloses proppants for hydraulic fracturing of oil andgas wells coated with a polyurea-type coating. In a preferredembodiment, the polyurea-type coating is formed by contacting apolymeric isocyanate with an amount of water and a blowing catalyst at arate and quantity sufficient to generate a reactive amine in situ on theouter surface of the proppant which thereby reacts with unconvertedpolymeric isocyanate to form a thin polyurea-type surface coating thatis substantially solid and lacks foam or substantial porosity.Alternatively, the polyurea-type can be produced by selecting reactiveamine compounds and isocyanates to develop the coated proppant. Thecoated proppants retain the discrete, free-flowing character of theoriginal core solids but with the beneficial effects of thepolyurea-type coating of the present invention.

McDaniel et al., in U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2014/0309149,provide proppants for use in fractured or gravel packed/frac packed oiland gas wells with a contaminant removal component to remove one or moreof the contaminants found in subterranean water/hydrocarbon from aproduction well. The water/hydrocarbon cleaning proppant solids may beused as discrete particles in a proppant formulation, as a coating onproppant solids in pores of a porous proppant solid or as part of theproppant's internal structure. The contaminant removal component removescontaminants, especially dissolved contaminants, in the subterraneanwater or hydrocarbon before the water/hydrocarbon leaves the well. Forthose contaminant removal components that can be regenerated, such asion exchange resins, a measured quantity of an acidic regenerationsolution can be injected into the fractured stratum for regeneration andrecovered when the well resumes production.

U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2014/0338906, in the name ofMonastiriotis et al., discloses polymer-coated proppants for hydraulicfracturing of oil and gas wells have an outer layer portion thatcomprises an organofunctional coupling agent, preferably anorganofunctional silane coupling agent. The use of an organofunctionalsilane coupling agent in the outer layer portion of the proppant coatingis preferably chosen to expose functionalities that will be reactivetowards similar functionalities of adjacent and similarly coatedproppants so that, when introduced down-hole, these proppants forminterparticle bonds at the temperatures and crack closure pressuresfound down-hole in fractured strata. Such enhanced interparticle bondinghelps keep the proppant in the fracture and maintains conductivity withreduced flow-back. The invention also helps proppants designed for lowtemperature well to bond more firmly and allows proppants designed forhigh temperature wells to bond well even at lower down-holetemperatures, thereby extending their useful range.

Hudson et al., in U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2015/0034314describe coated particles, such as proppants, processes for theirpreparation and methods for using such particles, such as in a hydraulicfracturing process. The coated particles are said to include a coatingthat includes a crystalline or semicrystalline polyester/polyurethanehaving a decrystallization temperature of at least 35° C. Hudson et al.make no mention of reducing dust on their proppants.

A need continues to exist in the art for a way to reduce or eliminatedust generated during sand handling for hydraulic fracturing operations.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, the present invention helps dramatically reduce dustgenerated during particle handling, for example in hydraulic fracturing,by coating particles with a resin-containing dispersion. This coatingprotects the surface of the proppant from abrasion and degradation. Suchresin-containing dispersion coated-particles may also reduce the wear onmetal parts used in transporting the sand.

These and other advantages and benefits of the present invention will beapparent from the Detailed Description of the Invention herein below.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The present invention will now be described for purposes of illustrationand not limitation in conjunction with the figures, wherein:

FIGS. 1-4 illustrate a pre-screening of candidate resin-containingdispersions on a hot glass plate;

FIG. 1 shows neat resin-fresh samples of the candidate resin-containingdispersions;

FIG. 2 shows neat resin-dry samples of the candidate resin-containingdispersions;

FIG. 3 shows neat resin+1% Surfactant, freshly applied samples of thecandidate resin-containing dispersions;

FIG. 4 shows neat resin+1% Surfactant, dried samples of the candidateresin-containing dispersions;

FIG. 5 shows 10% solid resin solutions+1% Surfactant (on neat resin)samples of the successful candidate resin-containing dispersions fromFIGS. 1-4;

FIG. 6 shows a comparison of the turbidity measurements of water frombare sand and from sand coated with a resin-containing dispersion;

FIG. 7 shows a comparison of dust reduction for several resin-containingdispersion coatings based on turbidity measurements;

FIG. 8 shows a comparison of dust reduction for several resin-containingdispersion coatings based on turbidity measurements using a shaker;

FIG. 9 shows a comparison of dust reduction based on turbiditymeasurements for a fresh sample of dispersion and a one week aged sampleof resin-containing dispersion;

FIG. 10 shows a comparison based on turbidity measurements severalresin-containing dispersions on sand aged for approximately six months;

FIG. 11 shows a comparison of dust reduction based on turbiditymeasurements for various ratios of resin-containing dispersion coatingsmade from a blend of an acrylic dispersion and a polyurethanedispersion;

FIG. 12 shows a comparison of dust reduction based on turbiditymeasurements for various ratios of resin-containing dispersion coatingsmade from a blend of another acrylic dispersion and the samepolyurethane dispersion as depicted in FIG. 11; and

FIG. 13 shows a comparison of coated sand abuse based on turbiditymeasurements at various concentrations of a polyurethane dispersion.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention will now be described for purposes of illustrationand not limitation. Except in the operating examples, or where otherwiseindicated, all numbers expressing quantities, percentages, and so forthin the specification are to be understood as being modified in allinstances by the term “about.”

Any numerical range recited in this specification is intended to includeall sub-ranges of the same numerical precision subsumed within therecited range. For example, a range of “1.0 to 10.0” is intended toinclude all sub-ranges between (and including) the recited minimum valueof 1.0 and the recited maximum value of 10.0, that is, having a minimumvalue equal to or greater than 1.0 and a maximum value equal to or lessthan 10.0, such as, for example, 2.4 to 7.6. Any maximum numericallimitation recited in this specification is intended to include alllower numerical limitations subsumed therein and any minimum numericallimitation recited in this specification is intended to include allhigher numerical limitations subsumed therein. Accordingly, Applicantsreserve the right to amend this specification, including the claims, toexpressly recite any sub-range subsumed within the ranges expresslyrecited herein. All such ranges are intended to be inherently describedin this specification such that amending to expressly recite any suchsub-ranges would comply with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112(a), and35 U.S.C. § 132(a).

Applicants reserve the right to proviso out or exclude any individualmembers of any such group, including any sub-ranges or combinations ofsub-ranges within the group, that can be claimed according to a range orin any similar manner, if for any reason Applicants choose to claim lessthan the full measure of the disclosure, for example, to account for areference that Applicants may be unaware of at the time of the filing ofthe application. Further, Applicants reserve the right to proviso out orexclude any individual resin-containing dispersion coating, or anymembers of a claimed group, if for any reason Applicants choose to claimless than the full measure of the disclosure, for example, to accountfor a reference that Applicants may be unaware of at the time of thefiling of the application.

Any patent, publication, or other disclosure material identified hereinis incorporated by reference into this specification in its entiretyunless otherwise indicated, but only to the extent that the incorporatedmaterial does not conflict with existing definitions, statements, orother disclosure material expressly set forth in this specification. Assuch, and to the extent necessary, the express disclosure as set forthin this specification supersedes any conflicting material incorporatedby reference herein. Any material, or portion thereof, that is said tobe incorporated by reference into this specification, but whichconflicts with existing definitions, statements, or other disclosurematerial set forth herein, is only incorporated to the extent that noconflict arises between that incorporated material and the existingdisclosure material. Applicants reserve the right to amend thisspecification to expressly recite any subject matter, or portionthereof, incorporated by reference herein.

Reference throughout this specification to “various non-limitingembodiments”, “certain embodiments”, or the like, means that aparticular feature or characteristic may be included in an embodiment.Thus, use of the phrase “in various non-limiting embodiments”, “incertain embodiments,” or the like, in this specification does notnecessarily refer to a common embodiment, and may refer to differentembodiments. Further, the particular features or characteristics may becombined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. Thus, theparticular features or characteristics illustrated or described inconnection with various or certain embodiments may be combined, in wholeor in part, with the features or characteristics of one or more otherembodiments without limitation. Such modifications and variations areintended to be included within the scope of the present specification.

The present invention is directed generally to resin-containingdispersion-coated proppants, methods for preparing the dispersion-coatedproppants, and methods for using these proppants in, for example,subterranean well formations and hydraulic fracturing operations.Resin-containing dispersion-coated proppants of the present inventionproduce significantly less dust during handling and transportoperations. This improves the ease in handling the proppants prior toand during their use. For example, these coated proppants do not need tobe transported to a well site in slurry or suspension form, but can bedistributed in bulk quantities as free-flowing solids.

To define more clearly the terms and concepts disclosed herein, thefollowing definitions are provided. To the extent that any definition orusage provided by any document incorporated herein by referenceconflicts with the definition or usage provided herein, the definitionor usage provided herein controls.

The terms “particle”, “particulate”, “particulate material” and thelike, when unmodified, are used herein to indicate the base materialwhich, when coated, forms a “proppant.” For example, hydraulicfracturing (fracking) sand is a material that is often referred to inthe art as a “proppant”, but in this disclosure, it is referred to as a“particle.” The terms “proppant”, “proppant particle”, “coatedproppant”, and the like, are reserved for resin-containingdispersion-coated particles in accordance with the teachings of thisinvention.

The term “free-flowing” is used herein to mean that the proppantparticles do not agglomerate appreciably, and generally remain asdiscrete, individual proppant particles. Proppants of the presentinvention are “free-flowing” at ambient conditions, i.e., at atemperature of about 20-25° C. and at atmospheric pressure. Theflowability of the solid particles can be measured using a test methodsuch as the American Foundrymen's Society Procedure 227-87-S, entitled“Moldability of Molding Sand Mixtures” as found in the Mold & Core TestHandbook, 2nd edition (1989), which is incorporated herein by reference.Briefly, the test procedure involves placing a 200 g sample of solidparticles in a cylindrical 8-mesh screen of a rotary screen devicedriven by a 57 rpm motor. The screen was rotated for 10 sec. Inaccordance with this test, the moldability index is equal to the weightof the product passing through the screen divided by the original weightcharged to the screen chamber (i.e., 200 g). If all of the materialpasses through the screen, the moldability index is 100%. In accordancewith the present invention, free-flowing proppants have a moldabilityindex of greater than about 80% at ambient conditions. For instance, theproppants disclosed herein can have a moldability index greater thanabout 85%, or greater than about 90%. In some aspects of this invention,the coated proppants have a moldability index of greater than about 95%,or alternatively, greater than about 98%. Generally, solid materialsthat are not free-flowing have a moldability index of less than about50%. Such materials can, in some cases, have a moldability index of lessthan about 40%, or less than about 25%.

Although any methods, devices, and materials similar or equivalent tothose described herein can be used in the practice or testing of theinvention, the typical methods, devices and materials are hereindescribed.

Although compositions and methods are described in terms of “comprising”various components or steps, the compositions and methods can also“consist essentially of” or “consist of” the various components orsteps.

The present invention is directed to resin-containing dispersion-coatedproppants, methods for preparing the coated proppants, and methods forusing these proppant particles in subterranean well formations andhydraulic fracturing operations, for example. A coated proppant inaccordance with one aspect of the present invention comprises (i) aparticle, and (ii) a resin-containing dispersion-coating on theparticle.

The coated particles of certain embodiments of the present invention canbe prepared by any of a variety of processes, including batch,semi-continuous, or continuous processes. Batch, continuous mixers orin-line where the sand is effectively agitated sufficient to spreadcoating onto the sand surface may be used to prepare the coatedparticles of some embodiments of the invention. Suitable methods ofcoating the particles include, but are not limited to, spraying,slurrying, flooding, and simply adding solution to bulk proppant andstirring. Application temperatures may be from about 4.4° C. (40°F.)—the coating solution must be flowable but protected from freezing—upto as high as approximately 232.22° C. (450° F.). At temperatures above100° C. (212° F.), i.e., the boiling point of water, the requiredcontact time of the solution should be limited due to the rapidevolution of water from the mixture. At lower application temperatures,the coated sand mixture requires longer drying times or the addition ofheat to speed the drying process.

In a sand processing plant, there are several application pointsincluding a wash step, drying step, during other transport processes orin-line or off-line with an additional mixing step where the presentinvention may find applicability. A separate coating process of the sandmay occur at an off-site location. In the case of coating doneseparately from the sand manufacturing, any of several batch orcontinuous coating methods may be employed, including those used toprepare resin-coated proppant designed for flowback control, forexample. Large scale mixers from Robert Sintos (sold by DelSolIndustrial Services) and WEBAC Corp. may be used. Both companies provideresin coating plant design that may be used in some embodiments of theinvention. In one aspect of the invention, the most preferred locationfor coating is at the site of the sand processing, either in-line withthe sand processing flow or nearby so as to minimize the handling andtransport of large quantities of sand and adding additional cost.Suitable process equipment for coating the sand includes, but is notlimited to, twin screw mixers, fluidized beds, modified single screwmixers, batch tanks with mixing blades, and single or multiple headsprayers.

The present invention is not limited to any specific type of particulatematerial for use as the proppant substrate (before providing theparticle or particulate with the coating containing a resin-containingdispersion material in accordance with the present invention), so longas the particle has sufficient strength to withstand the stresses, suchas elevated temperature and pressure, often encountered in oil and gasrecovery applications. In one aspect of the present invention, theparticle of the coated proppant is a sand, a naturally occurring mineralfiber, a ceramic, a bauxite, a glass, a metal bead, a walnut hull, acomposite particle, and the like. For instance, the sand can be gradedsand or a resin-coated sand. Such resin-coated sands include sandparticles coated with a curable thermosetting resin, for example, asdescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,837,656, the disclosure of which isincorporated herein by reference in its entirety. These resin-coatedsands can serve as particles in the present invention. A ceramic caninclude both porous and non-porous ceramic materials, while a bauxitecan include sintered bauxite materials. Composite particles are anagglomeration of smaller, fine particles held together by a binder, andsuch composite particles can be the particulate material in the presentinvention. Compositions containing coated proppants can employ mixturesor combinations of more than one type of particle, for instance, both asand and a ceramic can be coated and then mixed to form a composition ofcoated proppants. It is contemplated that any particulate materialsuitable for use in proppant applications can be used in the presentinvention, regardless of the specific gravity of the particle, althoughit can be beneficial in certain applications to have a lower specificgravity to increase the distance that the proppants can be carried intoa formation prior to settling.

In another aspect, the particle is either a porous ceramic or porouspolymer particle. Such particles are described in, for example, U.S.Pat. Nos. 7,426,961 and 7,713,918, the disclosures of which areincorporated herein by reference in their entirety. These porous ceramicor porous polymer materials can be of natural origin or can be producedsynthetically. Although the use of such materials is not limited byspecific gravity, the specific gravity of these materials is generallyless than about 3 g/cc, or less than about 2.7 g/cc. In another aspect,the specific gravity of the porous particle is less than about 2.5 g/cc,for example, less than about 2.2 g/cc.

The particle size of the particle used to produce the coated proppant ofthe present invention generally falls within a range from about 100 μmto about 3000 μm (about 3 mm). In another aspect, the particle size isfrom about 125 μm to about 2500 μm, from about 150 μm to about 2000 μm,or from about 175 μm to about 1500 μm. Yet, in another aspect, theparticle of the coated proppant of the present invention has a particlesize that falls within a narrower range of about 200 μm to about 1000μm, for example, about 250 μm to about 800 μm, or from about 300 μm toabout 700 μm.

In another aspect of this invention, the particles generally have a meshsize from about 8 and about 100, based on the U.S. Standard SieveSeries. For example, in a distribution of such particles which can beadded to a treating fluid for use in a subterranean formation, at leastabout 90% by weight of the particles have a particle size falling withinthe range from about 8 to about 100 mesh. In accordance with anotheraspect of the present invention, at least about 95% by weight of theparticles in a resin-containing dispersion-coated proppant compositionhave a size within the range from about 8 to about 100 mesh. Further,90% by weight or more (e.g., 95% or more) of the particles in aresin-containing dispersion-coated proppant composition can have a sizewithin the 20 to 40 mesh range in another aspect of this invention.

In a different aspect, the particle in the resin-containingdispersion-coated proppant has a size in the range from about 8 to about140 mesh, from 10 to about 120 mesh, from about 10 to about 100 mesh, orfrom about 14 to about 80 mesh. In other aspects of this invention, theparticle is in a range from about 18 to about 60 mesh, or from about 20mesh to about 40 mesh. In another aspect, there is less than about 10%by weight, for example, 5% by weight of less, of particles in a coatedproppant composition having a size of less than about 20 mesh or greaterthan about 50 mesh.

The proppants of the present invention generally comprise particleswhich are not limited to any particular material or size.

The coated particles described herein can be used in a variety ofapplications including, for example, use as a component of a coating,adhesive, or sealant composition, in which the coated particles aredispersed in a binder resin, such as any binder resin known to thoseskilled in the art of such compositions.

In certain embodiments, however, the coated particles of the presentinvention are thought to be particularly suitable for use in hydraulicfracturing a geologic formation. In these embodiments, the coatedparticles may be combined with a carrier fluid, such as water and/or ahydrocarbon, and the mixture injected at elevated pressure into a wellbore to an underground geologic formation. When the pressure in theformation resulting from the injection exceeds the strength of theformation, a fracture is formed and the coated particles, i.e.,proppant, are placed in the formation in an effort to maintain thefracture in a propped position when the injection pressure is released.Upon ceasing the injection of fluid, it is desired that the proppantforms a pack that serves to hold open the fractures, thereby providing ahighly conductive channel through which a desired material, such aswater, oil, or gas (including natural gas) can flow to the well bore forretrieval.

In certain embodiments, therefore, the coated particles are used in amethod of forming a proppant composition that includes suspending thecoated particles described herein in a carrier fluid to form asuspension and injecting the suspension into an underground geologicformation.

The coated particles described herein can be injected as the soleproppant or as a partial replacement for an existing proppant. Forexample, if desired, the coated particles described herein may comprises1 to 99 percent by weight, such as 10 to 90 percent by weight, or, insome cases, 10 to 50 percent by weight, based on the total weight of theproppant present in the composition that is injected into the well bore.In some embodiments, an uncoated proppant is first placed in a well, andthereafter a proppant of the coated particles described herein is placedin the fracture nearest to the wellbore or fracture openings.

The coated particles of the present invention are presently thought toprovide several advantages, particularly in the context of hydraulicfracturing. For example, the coated particles tend to drastically reducethe abrasion and degradation of the particles and therefore greatlyreduce the formation of dust from the particles. Such resin-containingdispersion coated-particles may also reduce the wear on metal parts usedin transporting the particles.

As used herein, the term “coating” refers to a set of chemicalcomponents that may be mixed to form an active coating composition thatmay be applied and cured to form a coating. As used herein, the term“coating composition” refers to a mixture of chemical components thatwill dry by eliminating water and/or co-solvent. Accordingly, a coatingcomposition may be formed from a coating system by mixing the chemicalcomponents comprising the coating system. Furthermore, when a list ofconstituents is provided herein that are individually suitable forforming the components of the coating system or coating compositiondiscussed herein, it should be understood that various combinations oftwo or more of those constituents, combined in a manner that would beknown to those of ordinary skill in the art reading the presentspecification, may be employed and is contemplated.

As used herein, the term “polyurethane” refers to polymeric oroligomeric materials comprising urethane groups, urea groups, or both.Accordingly, as used herein, the term “polyurethane” is synonymous withthe terms polyurea, poly(urethane/urea), and modifications thereof. Theterm “polyurethane” also refers to crosslinked polymer networks in whichthe crosslinks comprise urethane and/or urea linkages, and/or theconstituent polymer chains comprise urethane and/or urea linkages.Carbodiimide crosslinking as is known to those skilled in the art isalso contemplated in the coated proppants of the invention.

As used herein, the term “dispersion” refers to a composition comprisinga discontinuous phase distributed throughout a continuous phase. Forexample, “waterborne dispersion” and “aqueous dispersion” refer tocompositions comprising particles or solutes distributed throughoutliquid water. Waterborne dispersions and aqueous dispersions may alsoinclude one or more co-solvents in addition to the particles or solutesand water. As used herein, the term “dispersion” includes, for example,colloids, emulsions, suspensions, sols, solutions (i.e., molecular orionic dispersions), and the like. The resin-containing dispersion in thepresent invention may be applied at about 0.05 wt. % to about 2.0 wt. %resin solids based on the weight of the proppant.

As used herein, the term “polyisocyanate” refers to compounds comprisingat least two free isocyanate groups. Polyisocyanates includediisocyanates and diisocyanate reaction products comprising, forexample, biuret, isocyanurate, uretdione, urethane, urea,iminooxadiazine dione, oxadiazine trione, carbodiimide, acyl urea,and/or allophanate groups. As used herein, the term “polyol” refers tocompounds comprising at least two free hydroxy groups. Polyols includepolymers comprising pendant and/or terminal hydroxy groups. As usedherein, the term “polyamine” refers to compounds comprising at least twofree amine groups. Polyamines include polymer comprising pendant and/orterminal amine groups.

Water-dispersible polyisocyanates include polyisocyanates that may forman aqueous dispersion with the aid of organic co-solvents, protectivecolloids, and/or external emulsifiers under high shear conditions.Water-dispersible polyisocyanates also include polyisocyanates that arehydrophilically-modified with covalently linked internal emulsifiers.

The polyisocyanate may comprise any organic polyisocyanates havingaliphatically, cycloaliphatically, araliphatically, and/or aromaticallybound free isocyanate groups, which are liquid at room temperature orare dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture at room temperature. Invarious embodiments, the polyisocyanate may have a viscosity of from10-15000 mPa·s at 23° C., 10-5000 mPa·s at 23° C., or 50-1000 mPa·s at23° C. In various embodiments, the polyisocyanate may comprisepolyisocyanates or polyisocyanate mixtures having exclusivelyaliphatically and/or cycloaliphatically bound isocyanate groups with an(average) NCO functionality of 2.0-5.0 and a viscosity of from 10-5000mPa·s at 23° C., 50-1000 mPa·s at 23° C., or 100-1000 mPa·s at 23° C.

In various embodiments, the polyisocyanate may comprise polyisocyanatesor polyisocyanate mixtures based on one or more aliphatic orcycloaliphatic diisocyanates, such as, for example, ethylenediisocyanate; 1,4-tetramethylene diisocyanate; 1,6-hexamethylenediisocyanate (HDI); 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate;1,12-dodecamethylene diisocyanate;1-isocyanato-3-isocyanatomethyl-3,5,5-trimethyl-cyclohexane (isophoronediisocyanate or IPDI); bis-(4-isocyanatocyclohexyl)methane (H₁₂MDI);cyclohexane 1,4-diisocyanate;bis-(4-isocyanato-3-methyl-cyclohexyl)methane; PDI (pentanediisocyanate—bio-based) isomers of any thereof; or combinations of anythereof. In various embodiments, the polyisocyanate component maycomprise polyisocyanates or polyisocyanate mixtures based on one or morearomatic diisocyanates, such as, for example, benzene diisocyanate;toluene diisocyanate (TDI); diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI); isomersof any thereof; or combinations of any thereof. In various embodiments,the polyisocyanate component may comprise a triisocyanate, such as, forexample, 4-isocyanatomethyl-1,8-octane diisocyanate (triisocyanatononaneor TIN); isomers thereof; or derivatives thereof.

Additional polyisocyanates (including various diisocyanates) that mayalso find utility in the polyurethane coating useful in the presentinvention may include the polyisocyanates described in U.S. Pat. Nos.5,075,370; 5,304,400; 5,252,696; 5,750,613; and 7,205,356, each of whichis incorporated by reference herein. Combinations of any of theabove-identified and incorporated polyisocyanates may also be used toform a polyurethane dispersion useful herein.

The di- and tri-isocyanates indicated may be used as such, or asderivative polyisocyanates comprising biuret, isocyanurate, uretdione,urethane, urea, iminooxadiazine dione, oxadiazine trione, carbodiimide,acyl urea, and/or allophanate groups. In various embodiments, derivativepolyisocyanates comprising biuret, isocyanurate, uretdione, urethane,iminooxadiazine dione, oxadiazine trione, carbodiimide, acyl urea,and/or allophanate groups are included in the polyisocyanate coating. Invarious embodiments, the polyisocyanate component comprises one or moreof the above-identified structural groups prepared from IPDI, HDI,H₁₂MDI, and/or cyclohexane 1,4-diisocyanate.

The polyisocyanate may be hydrophilically-modified to bewater-dispersible. Hydrophilically-modified water-dispersiblepolyisocyanates are obtainable, for example, by covalent modificationwith an internal emulsifier comprising anionic, cationic, or nonionicgroups.

Polyether urethane type water-dispersible polyisocyanates may be formed,for example, from a reaction between polyisocyanates and less thanstoichiometric amounts of monohydric polyalkylene oxide polyetheralcohols. The preparation of such hydrophilically-modifiedpolyisocyanates is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,252,696,which is incorporated by reference herein. Polyether allophanate typewater-dispersible polyisocyanates may be formed, for example, from areaction between a polyalkylene oxide polyether alcohol and twopolyisocyanate molecules under allophanation conditions. The preparationof such hydrophilically-modified polyisocyanates is described, forexample, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,426,414, which is incorporated by referenceherein. The polyalkylene oxide polyether alcohol used to preparepolyether type hydrophilically-modified water-dispersiblepolyisocyanates may comprise, for example, polyethylene oxide residuesand/or polypropylene oxide residues.

Polyisocyanates may also be covalently modified with ionic orpotentially ionic internal emulsifying groups to formhydrophilically-modified water-dispersible polyisocyanates. The ionic orpotentially ionic groups may be cationic or anionic. As used herein, theterm “ionic or potentially ionic group” refers to a chemical group thatis nonionic under certain conditions and ionic under certain otherconditions. For example, in various embodiments, the ionic group orpotentially ionic group may comprise a carboxylic acid group; acarboxylate group; a sulfonic acid group; a sulfonate group; aphosphonic acid group; a phosphonate group; or combinations of anythereof. In this regard, for example, carboxylic acid groups, sulfonicacid groups, and phosphonic acid groups are potentially ionic groups,whereas, carboxylate groups, sulfonate groups, and phosphonate groupsare ionic groups in the form of a salt, such as, for example, a sodiumsalt.

For example, carboxylate (carboxylic acid) groups, sulfonate (sulfonicacid) groups, or phosphonate (phosphonic acid) groups may be covalentlyintroduced into polyisocyanates to form hydrophilically-modifiedwater-dispersible polyisocyanates. The ionic or potentially ionic groupsmay be introduced through a reaction between the isocyanate groups ofthe polyisocyanate and less than stoichiometric amounts ofamino-functional or hydroxy-functional carboxylic acids, sulfonic acids,phosphonic acids, or salts thereof. Examples include, but are notlimited to dimethylolpropionic acid (DMPA),N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-aminoethane sulfonic acid (AAS);N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-aminopropionic acid; 2-(cyclohexyl-amino)-ethanesulfonic acid; 3-(cyclohexyl-amino)-1-propane sulfonic acid (CAPS);2-aminoethylphosphonic acid; or the salts thereof.

If free carboxylic acids, sulfonic acids, or phosphonic acids areincorporated in the polyisocyanate, then the acids may be neutralizedwith a neutralizing agent, such as, for example, tertiary amines,including, but not limited to, trialkyl-substituted tertiary amines. Thepreparation of hydrophilically-modified water-dispersiblepolyisocyanates is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,767,958,which is incorporated by reference herein. Water-dispersiblepolyisocyanate mixtures based on triisocyanatononane (TIN) are describedin International Patent Application Publication No. WO-01/62819, whichis incorporated by reference herein

The NCO content of nonionic type hydrophilically-modifiedwater-dispersible polyisocyanates may be from 5 to 25 weight percent ofthe polyisocyanate molecule. The NCO content of ionic typehydrophilically-modified water-dispersible polyisocyanates may be from 4to 26 weight percent of the polyisocyanate molecule.

The polyisocyanates may also be partially blocked with compounds thatare reversibly reactive with isocyanate groups. Suitable blocking agentsfor polyisocyanates include, for example, monohydric alcohols such asmethanol, ethanol, butanol, hexanol, cyclohexanol, benzyl alcohol,oximes such as acetoxime, methyl ethyl ketoxime, cyclohexanone oxime,lactams such as .epsilon.-caprolactam, phenols, amines such asdiisopropylamine or dibutylamine, dimethylpyrazole or triazole, as wellas malonic acid dimethyl ester, malonic acid diethyl ester or malonicacid dibutyl ester.

In addition to the dispersion, the coating composition may include anydesired additives or auxiliaries. Suitable additives and auxiliariesinclude, but are not limited to, fillers, wetting agents, thickeners,fungicides, surfactants, and colorants.

Although primarily exemplified herein in connection with polyurethanedispersions and blends containing polyurethane dispersions, theinvention is not intended to be so limited. The present inventionencompasses acrylate dispersions and styrene butadiene rubber (“SBR”)latex dispersions as the resin-containing dispersion, either alone or incombination with one or more polyurethane dispersions.

It should be noted that the invention is not meant to have an impact onwell productivity. It is primarily aimed at preventing dust from beinggenerated during handling and transport of proppants such as sand.

EXAMPLES

The non-limiting and non-exhaustive examples that follow are intended tofurther describe various non-limiting and non-exhaustive embodimentswithout restricting the scope of the embodiments described in thisspecification. All quantities given in “parts” and “percents” areunderstood to be by weight, unless otherwise indicated. The followingmaterials were used in the Examples described herein:

SURFACTANT—a silicone surfactant for aqueous coatings commerciallyavailable as BYK 346 from BYK-Chemie GmbH;

RESIN A—an anionic dispersion of an aliphatic polyester urethane resinin water/n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone commercially available as BAYHYDROL 110from Bayer MaterialScience;

RESIN B—a core-shell styrene acrylate dispersion commercially availableas BAYHYDROL AH XP 2797 from Bayer MaterialScience;

RESIN C—an aqueous styrene acrylate dispersion commercially available asBAYHYDROL AH XP 2754 from Bayer MaterialScience;

RESIN D—an aqueous self-crosslinking polyacrylate dispersioncommercially available as BAYHYDROL AH XP 2814 from BayerMaterialScience;

RESIN E—an aqueous core-shell styrene acrylate dispersion commerciallyavailable as BAYHYDROL AH XP 2741 from Bayer MaterialScience;

RESIN F—an anionic aromatic urethane acrylic copolymer dispersioncommercially available from DSM as NEOPAC E-106;

RESIN G—a self-crosslinking acrylic dispersion commercially available asAC 2360 from Alberdingk Boley, Inc.;

RESIN H—an acrylic polymer commercially available as RHOPLEX EC-1791from Dow Chemical Company;

RESIN I—an anionic dispersion of an aliphatic polyester urethane resinin water/toluene commercially available as BAYHYDROL 140 AQ from BayerMaterialScience;

RESIN J—an aqueous colloidal dispersion of a polymer of2-chloro-butadiene commercially available as DISPERCOL C84 from BayerMaterialScience;

Several resin-containing dispersions were evaluated includingpolyurethane, polyacrylate, and a styrene butadiene rubber (“SBR”)latex. Using very low levels of a polyurethane dispersion coating (0.2%solid coating on sand solids) a greater than 90% reduction in dust wasobserved. The sand was coated and allowed to dry as unconsolidatedparticles. A quantity of coated, loose sand was then placed in a jarwith a quantity of water and agitated to allow the water to remove anydust from the sand particles. The dust was visible as turbidity in thewater. A turbidity reading was made of the water to assess theeffectiveness of the coating. Although many coatings showed a smallimprovement in turbidity, the polyurethane dispersions were especiallyeffective even against additional agitation in an “abuse” typesimulation. Critical to the effectiveness of the coating is the use of awetting agent (SURFACTANT) in the formula. This wetting agent allowedthe present inventors to minimize the coating thickness and promoteduniformity of the coating on the particle.

Examples 0-7

TABLE I summarizes the results of hot glass plate prescreening testsusing the above-detailed materials. For each RESIN above, a one percentSURFACTANT solution was prepared by combining 20 g RESIN solution+0.2 gSURFACTANT. The glass plate was heated in oven to 122° C. and thematerials were dropped onto the glass (at an angle). The flow of thematerials was observed. Example 0 was a control. As can be appreciatedby reference to FIGS. 1-4, Examples 1, 2, 3 and 4 exhibited cracking andwere eliminated from further testing. Examples 5, 6 and 7 exhibited goodflow and were tested further. The surface of Example 7 was sticky afterovernight drying so the formulation may cause problems when applied tosand.

TABLE I Ex. % 10% solution with 1% SURFACTANT No. RESIN solid (on neatresin) 0 A 35 100 g A + 1 g SURFACTANT + 250 g DI water 1 B 43 100 g B +1 g SURFACTANT + 330 g DI water 2 C 40 100 g C + 1 g SURFACTANT + 300 gDI water 3 D 45.5 100 g D + 1 g SURFACTANT + 355 g DI water 4 E 40 100 gE + 1 g SURFACTANT + 300 g DI water 5 F 33 100 g F + 1 g SURFACTANT +230 g DI water 6 G 47 100 g G + 1 g SURFACTANT + 370 g DI water 7 H 55100 g H + 1 g SURFACTANT + 450 g DI water

A subsequent test was conducted on the promising resin-containingdispersion candidates from the pre-screening test. 10% solid RESINsolutions+1% SURFACTANT (on neat resin) with the results depicted inFIG. 5. As can be appreciated by reference to FIG. 5, RESINS 0, 5, 6, 7all showed good flow; with RESIN 5 having the best result.

The RESINS were used to coat sand particles and the resultant materialswere assessed for dust reduction by measuring turbidity of watersolutions containing the coated sand particles after being agitated. The10% solutions of each RESIN were prepared according to TABLE II below.

TABLE II % RESIN solid 10% solution with 1% SURFACTANT (on neat resin) A35 100 g A + 1 g SURFACTANT + 250 g DI water B 43 100 g B + 1 gSURFACTANT + 330 g DI water C 40 100 g C + 1 g SURFACTANT + 300 g DIwater D 45.5 100 g D + 1 g SURFACTANT + 355 g DI water E 40 100 g E + 1g SURFACTANT + 300 g DI water F 33 100 g F + 1 g SURFACTANT + 230 g DIwater G 47 100 g G + 1 g SURFACTANT + 370 g DI water H 55 100 g H + 1 gSURFACTANT + 450 g DI water I 40 100 g I + 1 g SURFACTANT + 300 g DIwater J 55 100 g J + 1 g SURFACTANT + 450 g DI water

Fresh, bare sand and fresh, bare sand coated with RESIN A were measuredas controls for dust reduction as follows:

1. 500 g bare sand (ASTM 20/40 mesh from Carbo Ceramics) was weighed inmixing bowl and heated to 122° C. in an oven.

2. 10 g of the 10% solid solution of RESIN A was added under agitationin a mixer (KITCHENAID) until the sand cooled (approximately 6-8minutes). Note: the sand was quickly mixed for 10 sec., the agitationstopped, the mix head lifted, the solution poured in, the mix head wasput down and the mixture was agitated at a 4-6 setting).

3. The resulting material was allowed to cool further for about 5 minand 50 g of the material was mixed with 50 g tap water. The resultantmaterials were spin mixed for 10 sec.

4. The water was transferred into a glass vial and the turbiditymeasured using a turbidimeter for a turbidity rating in NTU unitsaccording to ASTM D7726.

Water from bare sand had a turbidity of 730 NTU whereas water from thebare sand+RESIN A solution had a turbidity of 54 NTU. Thus, coating thesand with RESIN A resulted in a greater than 90% reduction in dust.These results are graphically presented in FIG. 6.

The process described in paragraphs [0095] to [0098] was repeated exceptpre-coated sand (phenolic resin coated sand from Carbo Ceramics) wasfurther coated with the RESINS noted below in TABLE III. Turbiditymeasurements are given below and the data is presented graphically inFIG. 7.

TABLE III Ex. Turbidity No. RESIN (NTU) 8 Control (phenolic resin) 29389 RESIN A 56.4 10 RESIN F 272 11 RESIN G 13.6 12 RESIN I 245

A shaker test was conducted on pre-coated sand (phenolic resin coatedsand from Carbo Ceramics) further coated with the RESINS A or G asfollows. Briefly, 200 g of each sand sample was placed in a quart metalpaint can and shaken for 30 min. on a paint shaker. The turbidity of thewater was measured, as before, using a turbidimeter for a turbidityrating in NTU units according to ASTM D7726. The control (phenolic resincoated sand) water had a turbidity of 1654 NTU; water from the RESIN Acoated sand had a turbidity of 10.9 NTU; and water from the RESIN Gcoated sand had a turbidity of 2.9 NTU. These data are presentedgraphically in FIG. 8.

A second shaker test (as described in in the preceding paragraph [0102])was conducted to determine the effect of ageing of RESIN A on pre-coatedsand (phenolic resin coated sand from Carbo Ceramics). The turbidity ofwater from fresh sample of RESIN A-coated sand and water from a sampleof sand coated with RESIN A which had been aged for one week were bothmeasured as described above. Water from the fresh sample of RESINA-coated sand had a turbidity of 56.4 NTU, whereas that from a one weekaged sample of RESIN A had a turbidity of 8.98 NTU. These results aregraphically shown in FIG. 9.

The process described in paragraphs [0096] to [0099] was repeated exceptapproximately six month old coated sand (phenolic resin coated sand fromCarbo Ceramics) further coated with the RESINS noted below in TABLE IVwere used. The turbidity measurements were made as described elsewhereherein and are given below in TABLE IV with the data presentedgraphically in FIG. 10. Both RESIN A and RESIN G coated sand showed agreater than 90% reduction in dust. The sand coated with RESIN H had aclumpy appearance.

TABLE IV Turbidity Sample (NTU) Control Coated Sand 4000 RESIN A 320RESIN G 300 RESIN H 69

The process described in paragraphs [0096] to [0099] was repeated except40/70 mesh sand (exceptionally dusty—the sand not fully processed torender it “clean”) was coated with the blends of RESINS H and A notedbelow in TABLE V. The turbidity measurements were made as describedherein and are given below in TABLE V with the data presentedgraphically in FIG. 11. As can be appreciated by reference to FIG. 11,an acceptable level of dust reduction occurred with a 50:50 blend of tworesin-containing dispersions.

TABLE V Turbidity SAMPLE RESIN H:RESIN A (NTU) None None 1355 RESIN H100% 100:0  1336 RESIN H 75% + RESIN A 25% 75:25 410 RESIN H 50% + RESINA 50% 50:50 24.3 RESIN H 25% + RESIN A 75% 25:75 14.6 RESIN A 100% 0:100 5.9

The process described in paragraphs [0096] to [0099] was repeated except40/70 sand (exceptionally dusty as in the previous examples) was coatedwith the blends of RESINS B and A noted below in TABLE VI. The turbiditymeasurements were made as described herein and are given below in TABLEVI with the data presented graphically in FIG. 12. As can be appreciatedby reference to FIG. 12, an acceptable level of dust reduction wasachieved with a 50:50 blend.

TABLE VI Turbidity SAMPLE RESIN B:RESIN A (NTU) None None 1355 RESIN B100% 100:0  1075 RESIN B 75% + RESIN A 25% 75:25 1065 RESIN B 50% +RESIN A 50% 50:50 62.3 RESIN B 25% + RESIN A 75% 25:75 25.7 RESIN A 100% 0:100 5.9

FIG. 13 shows a comparison of coated sand abuse based on turbiditymeasurements at various concentrations of polyurethane dispersion (RESINA). The shaker test described in paragraph [0106] was repeated with40/70 mesh sand (exceptionally dusty as in the previous examples) coatedwith the percent weight of RESIN A specified in TABLE VII. The turbidityof the water was measured, as before, using a turbidimeter for aturbidity rating in NTU units according to ASTM D7726.

TABLE VII % weight Turbidity RESIN A (NTU) 0.20 1645 0.40 1033 0.80 2101.60 7.56

This specification has been written with reference to variousnon-limiting and non-exhaustive embodiments. However, it will berecognized by persons having ordinary skill in the art that varioussubstitutions, modifications, or combinations of any of the disclosedembodiments (or portions thereof) may be made within the scope of thisspecification. Thus, it is contemplated and understood that thisspecification supports additional embodiments not expressly set forthherein. Such embodiments may be obtained, for example, by combining,modifying, or reorganizing any of the disclosed steps, components,elements, features, aspects, characteristics, limitations, and the like,of the various non-limiting embodiments described in this specification.In this manner, Applicant(s) reserve the right to amend the claimsduring prosecution to add features as variously described in thisspecification, and such amendments comply with the requirements of 35U.S.C. § 112(a), and 35 U.S.C. § 132(a).

Various aspects of the subject matter described herein are set out inthe following numbered clauses:

1. A coated proppant comprising: a core; and a resin-containingdispersion coating surrounding the core, wherein the coated proppant hasat least about a 90% reduction in dust as compared to a comparable corein an uncoated state.

2. The coated proppant according to clause 1, wherein the core comprisesone selected from the group consisting of sand, mineral fiber, a ceramicparticle, a bauxite particle, a glass particle, a metal bead, a walnuthull, a composite particle and coated sand.

3. The coated proppant according to one of clauses 1 and 2, wherein theresin-containing dispersion is applied at about 0.05 wt. % to about 2.0wt. % resin solids based on the weight of the proppant.

4. The coated proppant according to any one of clauses 1 to 3, whereinthe resin-containing dispersion comprises the reaction product of anisocyanate and an isocyanate reactive compound.

5. The coated proppant according to clause 4, wherein the isocyanate isone selected from the group consisting of aliphatic or cycloaliphaticdiisocyanates, aromatic diisocyanates and triisocyanates.

6. The coated proppant according to clause 4, wherein the isocyanate isselected from the group consisting of ethylene diisocyanate,1,4-tetramethylene diisocyanate, 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI),2,2,4-trimethyl-1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate, 1,12-dodecamethylenediisocyanate,1-isocyanato-3-isocyanatomethyl-3,5,5-trimethyl-cyclohexane (isophoronediisocyanate or IPDI), bis-(4-isocyanatocyclohexyl)methane (H₁₂MDI),cyclohexane 1,4-diisocyanate,bis-(4-isocyanato-3-methyl-cyclohexyl)methane, pentane diisocyanate(PDI), benzene diisocyanate, toluene diisocyanate (TDI), diphenylmethanediisocyanate (MDI) and 4-isocyanatomethyl-1,8-octane diisocyanate(triisocyanatononane or TIN).

7. The coated proppant according to any one of clauses 1 to 6, whereinthe resin-containing dispersion comprises a blend of dispersions.

8. The coated proppant according to clause 7, wherein the blendcomprises one or more selected from the group consisting of polyurethanedispersions, polyacrylate dispersions and styrene butadiene rubber(“SBR”) latex dispersions.

9. A process for coating a proppant comprising disposing aresin-containing dispersion over at least a portion of a proppant core,wherein the coated proppant has at least about a 90% reduction in dustas compared to a comparable core in an uncoated state.

10. The process according to clause 9, wherein the core comprises oneselected from the group consisting of sand, mineral fiber, a ceramicparticle, a bauxite particle, a glass particle, a metal bead, a walnuthull, a composite particle and coated sand.

11. The process according to one of clauses 9 and 10, wherein theresin-containing dispersion is applied at about 0.05 wt. % to about 2.0wt. % resin solids based on the weight of the proppant.

12. The process according to any one of clauses 9 to 11, wherein theresin-containing dispersion comprises the reaction product of anisocyanate and an isocyanate reactive compound.

13. The process according to clause 12, wherein the isocyanate is oneselected from the group consisting of aliphatic or cycloaliphaticdiisocyanates, aromatic diisocyanates and triisocyanates.

14. The process according to clause 12, wherein the isocyanate isselected from the group consisting of ethylene diisocyanate,1,4-tetramethylene diisocyanate, 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI),2,2,4-trimethyl-1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate, 1,12-dodecamethylenediisocyanate,1-isocyanato-3-isocyanatomethyl-3,5,5-trimethyl-cyclohexane (isophoronediisocyanate or IPDI), bis-(4-isocyanatocyclohexyl)methane (H₁₂MDI),cyclohexane 1,4-diisocyanate,bis-(4-isocyanato-3-methyl-cyclohexyl)methane, pentane diisocyanate(PDI), benzene diisocyanate, toluene diisocyanate (TDI), diphenylmethanediisocyanate (MDI) and 4-isocyanatomethyl-1,8-octane diisocyanate(triisocyanatononane or TIN).

15. The process according to any one of clauses 9 to 14, wherein theresin-containing dispersion comprises a blend of dispersions.

16. The process according to clause 15, wherein the blend comprises oneor more selected from the group consisting of polyurethane dispersions,polyacrylate dispersions and styrene butadiene rubber (“SBR”) latexdispersions.

17. A process for reducing dust from a proppant comprising disposing aresin-containing dispersion over at least a portion of a proppant core,wherein the coated proppant core has at least about a 90% reduction indust as compared to a comparable core in an uncoated state.

18. The process according to clause 17, wherein the core comprises oneselected from the group consisting of sand, mineral fiber, a ceramicparticle, a bauxite particle, a glass particle, a metal bead, a walnuthull, a composite particle and coated sand.

19. The process according to one of clauses 17 and 18, wherein theresin-containing dispersion is applied at about 0.05 wt. % to about 2.0wt. % resin solids based on the weight of the proppant.

20. The process according to any one of clauses 17 to 19, wherein theresin-containing dispersion comprises the reaction product of anisocyanate and an isocyanate reactive compound.

21. The process according to clause 20, wherein the isocyanate is oneselected from the group consisting of aliphatic or cycloaliphaticdiisocyanates, aromatic diisocyanates and triisocyanates.

22. The process according to clause 20, wherein the isocyanate isselected from the group consisting of ethylene diisocyanate,1,4-tetramethylene diisocyanate, 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI),2,2,4-trimethyl-1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate, 1,12-dodecamethylenediisocyanate,1-isocyanato-3-isocyanatomethyl-3,5,5-trimethyl-cyclohexane (isophoronediisocyanate or IPDI), bis-(4-isocyanatocyclohexyl)methane (H₁₂MDI),cyclohexane 1,4-diisocyanate,bis-(4-isocyanato-3-methyl-cyclohexyl)methane, pentane diisocyanate(PDI), benzene diisocyanate, toluene diisocyanate (TDI), diphenylmethanediisocyanate (MDI) and 4-isocyanatomethyl-1,8-octane diisocyanate(triisocyanatononane or TIN).

23. The process according to any one of clauses 17 to 22, wherein theresin-containing dispersion comprises a blend of dispersions.

24. The process according to any one of clauses 17 to 23, wherein theblend comprises one or more selected from the group consisting ofpolyurethane dispersions, polyacrylate dispersions and styrene butadienerubber (“SBR”) latex dispersions.

1. A coated proppant comprising: a core; and a styrene butadiene rubber(“SBR”) latex containing dispersion coating disposed over at least aportion of the core, wherein the coated proppant has at least about a90% reduction in dust as compared to a comparable core in an uncoatedstate.
 2. The coated proppant according to claim 1, wherein the corecomprises one selected from the group consisting of sand, mineral fiber,a ceramic particle, a bauxite particle, a glass particle, a metal bead,a walnut hull, a composite particle and coated sand.
 3. The coatedproppant according to claim 1, wherein the resin-containing dispersionis applied at about 0.05 wt. % to about 2.0 wt. % resin solids based onthe weight of the proppant. 4-7. (canceled)
 8. The coated proppantaccording to claim 1, wherein styrene butadiene rubber (“SBR”)latex-containing dispersion further comprises one or more selected fromthe group consisting of polyurethane dispersions and polyacrylatedispersions.
 9. A process for coating a proppant comprising: disposing astyrene butadiene rubber (“SBR”) latex containing dispersion over atleast a portion of a proppant core, wherein the coated proppant has atleast about a 90% reduction in dust as compared to a comparable core inan uncoated state.
 10. The process according to claim 9, wherein thecore comprises one selected from the group consisting of sand, mineralfiber, a ceramic particle, a bauxite particle, a glass particle, a metalbead, a walnut hull, a composite particle and coated sand.
 11. Theprocess according to claim 9, wherein the styrene butadiene rubber(“SBR”) latex containing dispersion is applied at about 0.05 wt. % toabout 2.0 wt. % resin solids based on the weight of the proppant. 12-15.(canceled)
 16. The process according to claim 9, wherein the styrenebutadiene rubber (“SBR”) latex-containing dispersion further comprisesone or more selected from the group consisting of polyurethanedispersions and polyacrylate dispersions.
 17. A process for reducingdust from a proppant comprising; disposing a styrene butadiene rubber(“SBR”) latex containing dispersion over at least a portion of aproppant core, wherein the coated proppant core has at least about a 90%reduction in dust as compared to a comparable core in an uncoated state.18. The process according to claim 17, wherein the core comprises oneselected from the group consisting of sand, mineral fiber, a ceramicparticle, a bauxite particle, a glass particle, a metal bead, a walnuthull, a composite particle and coated sand.
 19. The process according toclaim 17, wherein the styrene butadiene rubber (“SBR”) latex containingdispersion is applied at about 0.05 wt. % to about 2.0 wt. % resinsolids based on the weight of the proppant. 20-23. (canceled)
 24. Theprocess according to claim 17, wherein the styrene butadiene rubber(“SBR”) latex-containing dispersion further comprises one or moreselected from the group consisting of polyurethane dispersions andpolyacrylate dispersions.